History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clack v. State
1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 113
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1935
|
Check Treatment

The indictment in the case is in all things regular and properly charges the offense of which the defendant was convicted.

The bill of exceptions fails to disclose any exceptions of merit.

Refused charge 1, being the only charge refused to defendant, is elliptical, and for that reason was properly refused.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Clack v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 7, 1935
Citation: 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 113
Docket Number: 5 Div. 962.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.