History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lyles v. State
117 So. 908
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1928
|
Check Treatment

Without going into a detailed discussion of the evidence, we hold that the facts and legal inferences to be drawn therefrom are sufficient to sustain the conviction. The facts in this case are easily distinguishable from the facts in those cases cited by appellant in his brief.

Refused charge 4 is an argument, and refused charge 5 is not predicated upon all of the evidence.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed. *Page 571

Case Details

Case Name: Lyles v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 30, 1928
Citation: 117 So. 908
Docket Number: 8 Div. 672.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.