History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daniel v. State
23 Ala. App. 619
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary. The court has read the entire evidence, sitting en banc. We are of the opinion that it fails, by any legal tendency, to connect the appellant with the commission of the offense charged. For that reason, the general affirmative charge in his favor, duly requested, should have been given to the jury, and, for the error in its refusal, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Daniel v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 26, 1929
Citation: 23 Ala. App. 619
Docket Number: 8 Div. 716.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.