History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lampkin v. Thomas
202 Ala. 316
| Ala. | 1918
|
Check Treatment

Eliminating the question of the credibility of the witnesses, we are of the opinion that the evidence in this case did not justify the allowance of the item of $3 for oats and $2.50 for corn, as part of the account against defendant.

Let the judgment be corrected by deducting these items, and, as corrected, affirmed at the cost of appellee.

Corrected and affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur. *Page 317

Case Details

Case Name: Lampkin v. Thomas
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 28, 1918
Citation: 202 Ala. 316
Docket Number: 8 Div. 111.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.