History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Smith
211 Ala. 267
| Ala. | 1924
|
Check Treatment

The decree of the circuit court will be affirmed as to the findings of fact. The testimony was taken ore tenus before the judge rendering the decree. The rule of Hackett v. Cash,196 Ala. 403, 72 So. 52, was extended to chancery causes in Andrews v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 So. 62, and Ray v. Watkins, 203 Ala. 683, 85 So. 25. As to taxing costs against complainant, the decree is corrected on authority of State ex rel. Davis, as Solicitor, v. Brown et al. (Ala. Sup.)100 So. 224;1 the state's said agent may not be taxed with the costs.

The decree of the circuit court, in equity, is corrected and affirmed.

Corrected and affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

1 Ante, p. 266. *Page 268

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Davis v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Apr 17, 1924
Citation: 211 Ala. 267
Docket Number: 6 Div. 35.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.