History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nichols v. Hardegree
1918 Ala. LEXIS 323
| Ala. | 1918
|
Check Treatment

The failure of the appellant to assign any errors requires the affirmance of the judgment below. Rule 1, Supreme Court Prac. (20 South. iv); Civil Code, p. 1506; Pettibone v. Bank,156 Ala. 666, 46 So. 751; Amerson v. Corona Coal Co.,194 Ala. 175, 69 So. 601; Kinnon v. L. N. R. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480,65 So. 397; Dickens v. Dickens, 174 Ala. 345, 56 So. 809; Brahan v. Collins, Minor, 169; Chavers v. Mayo, ante, p. 128, 79 So. 594.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Nichols v. Hardegree
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 27, 1918
Citation: 1918 Ala. LEXIS 323
Docket Number: 7 Div. 845.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.