History
  • No items yet
midpage
Savage v. Nadler
182 So. 80
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1938
|
Check Treatment

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellees in a suit brought against them, on an alleged joint contract, by appellant.

The case was tried by the court, sitting without a jury. The rules of review are too well known to need re-statement.

The pleas were "in short by consent." We are not sure that we understand, exactly, what is meant by that; but the issues that were litigated are simple and not difficult of comprehension from the record.

Appellees denied any joint contract; and claimed that all amounts due appellant by Mrs. Leak had been paid.

The evidence was in conflict; and we see no occasion to overturn the judgment rendered.

It is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Savage v. Nadler
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 5, 1938
Citation: 182 So. 80
Docket Number: 7 Div. 349.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.