History
  • No items yet
midpage
State of Alabama On The Relation of Irvine Porter v. Dun & Bradstreet
472 F.2d 1049
| 5th Cir. | 1973
|
Check Treatment

472 F.2d 1049

STATE OF ALABAMA on the relation of Irvine C. PORTER,
chairman of the Unauthorized practices of law
committee of the Alabama State Bar, and
Irvine C. Porter,
individually,
Plaintiffs-
Appellants,
v.
DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 72-2654. Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1973.

Marvin Cherner, Frank M. Young, III, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Drayton T. Scott, Drayton Nabers, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for defendant-appellee.

Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This case involves the problem of what is and what is not the practice of law under Title 46, Section 42, Code of Alabama, 1940. We affirm on the basis of the District Court's opinion. State of Alabama on the relation of Irvine C. Porter v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 352 F.Supp. 1226 (N.D.Ala. 1972).

2

Affirmed.

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Case Details

Case Name: State of Alabama On The Relation of Irvine Porter v. Dun & Bradstreet
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 31, 1973
Citation: 472 F.2d 1049
Docket Number: 72-2654
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.