History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eleanor M. Hemstreet, Member, Concerned Citizens of Justice, Inc. v. Edward C. Schade
459 F.2d 49
| 9th Cir. | 1972
|
Check Treatment

459 F.2d 49

Eleanor M. HEMSTREET, Member, Concerned Citizens of Justice,
Inc., Appellant,
v.
Edward C. SCHADE et al., Appellees.

No. 71-2667.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

April 14, 1972.
Rehearing Denied May 15, 1972.

Eleanor M. Hemstreet, in pro. per.

William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Matthew A. Schumacher, Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., Christopher M. Reuss, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before KOELSCH, DUNIWAY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Eleanor M. Hemstreet appeals from an order dismissing her complaint, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8.

2

A dismissal of a complaint, without dismissal of the action, is not a "final order" under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. Dockery v. Dockery, 437 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1971). No "special circumstances" here indicate that the complaint could not be saved by amendment. The order appealed from is not an appealable order. Jackson v. Nelson, 405 F.2d 872, 873 (9th Cir. 1968).

3

The appeal is accordingly dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Plaintiff may move in the district court for leave to file an amended complaint. Thereafter, further proceedings should be governed by the procedure outlined in Potter v. McCall, 433 F.2d 1087 (9th Cir. 1970).

4

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Eleanor M. Hemstreet, Member, Concerned Citizens of Justice, Inc. v. Edward C. Schade
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: May 15, 1972
Citation: 459 F.2d 49
Docket Number: 71-2667
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.