History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona
448 F.2d 1355
| 9th Cir. | 1971
|
Check Treatment

448 F.2d 1355

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Eduardo OSUNA-LORONA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 26338.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 30, 1971.

Rush G. Glick, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Criminal Division, Phillip W. Johnson, Special Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before KOELSCH, CARTER and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment and conviction in this narcotics case for transporting and facilitating the sale of 10 ounces of heroin is affirmed. The district court's resolution of conflicting facts concerning the admissibility of appellant's statement must be sustained on appeal, and the 10 year sentence he received does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Gallego v. United States, 276 F.2d 914, 917-918 (9 Cir. 1960); Black v. United States, 269 F.2d 38, 43 (9 Cir. 1959).

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 30, 1971
Citation: 448 F.2d 1355
Docket Number: 26338_1
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.