History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Charles L. Barnett
448 F.2d 36
| 9th Cir. | 1971
|
Check Treatment

448 F.2d 36

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles L. BARNETT, Appellant.

No. 71-1954.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 8, 1971.

Ron Bain, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, William R. Hawes, Alan Friedman, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment of conviction in this heroin case is affirmed.

2

We reject the point that the government should have produced at the trial two government informants. The short and full answer is that no demand was ever made for their production. If such a demand had been made and refused, we could consider the significance thereof. It certainly was not plain error.

3

Other points raised, we likewise find to be without merit.

Notes:

*

The Honorable Fred M. Taylor, Chief Judge, United States District Court, District of Idaho, sitting by designation

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Charles L. Barnett
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 8, 1971
Citation: 448 F.2d 36
Docket Number: 71-1954
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.