History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ernest Harvey Olsen, and v. United States
446 F.2d 912
| 9th Cir. | 1971
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order adjudging Olsen guilty of civil contempt is affirmed.

This court’s stay of the district court’s order is terminated effective at noon, Pacific time, August 10, 1971.






Concurrence Opinion

HUFSTEDLER, Judge

(concurring and dissenting):

I concur in the result reached by a majority of the panel under the compulsion of In re Bacon (9th Cir. 1971) 446 F.2d 667; cf. United States v. Gelbard and United States v. Pamas (9th Cir. 1971) 443 F.2d 837. Were the question open in this Circuit, I would hold that 18 U.S.C. § 2515 precluded a finding of contempt for reasons stated in the opinions of Judges Adams and Rosenn in In re Joques Egan (3d Cir. 1971) (en banc) [No. 71-1088, May 28, 1971] and in the opinions of Judges Bazelon and Wright in In re Evans and In re Fishlowitz (D.C. Cir. 1971) [Nos. 71-1499 & 71-1521, July 23, 1971].

I would enlarge the appellant on bail pending the filing of his petition for cer-tiorari.

Case Details

Case Name: Ernest Harvey Olsen, and v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 6, 1971
Citation: 446 F.2d 912
Docket Number: 71-2081_1
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.