History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peter Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corporation
441 F.2d 536
| 5th Cir. | 1971
|
Check Treatment

441 F.2d 536

Peter ARIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
BIG TEN TAXI CORPORATION, Employers Service Corporation and
Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 31149 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431
F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 4, 1971.

Peter Aris, pro se.

G. A. Haddad, Miami, Fla., Patrick H. Mears, Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, Fla., James R. Parks, Samuel O. Hoffman of Preddy, Haddad, Kutner Hardy, P.A., Miami, Fla., for respondents-appellees.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. SIMPSON, Circuit judges.

1

Peter Aris has appealed from the district court's dismissal of his petition for review of an order of the Florida Supreme Court denying certiorari. The district court correctly held that it lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit. See 28 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 1257(3); Iacaponi v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, W.D.Pa.1966, 258 F.Supp. 880, 884, affirmed 379 F.2d 311, cert. denied ,1968, 389 U.S. 1054, 88 S.Ct. 802, 19 L.Ed.2d 849. The order appealed from is due to be and is hereby affirmed.

2

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Peter Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corporation
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: May 4, 1971
Citation: 441 F.2d 536
Docket Number: 536
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.