History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stoy Decker v. United States
423 F.2d 726
| 6th Cir. | 1970
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

ORDER

Before EDWARDS, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the briefs and files and records in this case, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the Order of the District Judge, dated July 9, 1969. Decker v. United States, 310 F.Supp. 674 (W.D.Ky.1969). See also Graham v. United States, 407 F.2d 1313 (6th Cir. 1969).






Dissenting Opinion

McCREE, Circuit Judge

(dissenting).

I dissent. I would reverse the decision of the District Court for the reasons stated by Judge Sobeloff in United States v. Miller, 406 F.2d 1100 (4th Cir. 1969), a case holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85, 88 S.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed.2d 923 (1968), should be given retrospective effect. See also United States v. Lucia, 416 F.2d 920 (5th Cir. 1969), holding, in an opinion by Judge Wisdom, that retrospective effect should be given the related decisions of Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 19 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and Grosso v. United States, 390 U.S. 62, 88 S.Ct. 716, 19 L.Ed.2d 906 (1968).

Case Details

Case Name: Stoy Decker v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 20, 1970
Citation: 423 F.2d 726
Docket Number: 19846_1
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.