History
  • No items yet
midpage
National Labor Relations Board v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc.
405 F.2d 494
| 9th Cir. | 1968
|
Check Treatment

405 F.2d 494

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
LEVINSON'S OWL REXALL DRUGS, INC., Respondent.

No. 22259.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 4, 1968.

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Roy O, Hoffman, Dir., N.L.R.B., Julius Rosenbaum (argued), Glen M. Bendixsen, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Laurence P. Corbett (argued), of Corbett & Welden, Berkeley, Cal., Carroll, Davis, Burdick & McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL, BROWNING and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The NLRB seeks enforcement of its order entered respecting respondent as reported at 161 N.L.R.B. No. 133.

2

While the Board might well have gone the other way (as the hearing examiner did), we find substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's finding that respondent violated 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 158(a)(3) and (1), by discriminatorily discharging employee Beverly Marsh to discourage union membership and activity.

3

Accordingly the Board's order is entitled to enforcement. It is so ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: National Labor Relations Board v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 4, 1968
Citation: 405 F.2d 494
Docket Number: 22259_1
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.