History
  • No items yet
midpage
David Ernest Ingle v. United States
399 F.2d 690
| 9th Cir. | 1968
|
Check Treatment

399 F.2d 690

David Ernest INGLE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 22763.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1968.

Ivan R. Ashleman (argued), Las Vegas, Nev., for appellant.

Robert S. Linnell (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Joseph L. Ward, U.S. Atty., South Las Vegas, Nev., for appellee.

Before MERRILL and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.1

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant, convicted of unlawful possession of stolen mail in violation of Title 18, U.S.C. 1701, has taken this appeal. He argues persuasively the abstract proposition that the Rules of Criminal Procedure should, in all fairness, grant the right to discover the names of grand jury witnesses and require provision of a transcript of their testimony. The rules simply do not so provide and it is difficult to see how, under the defense he asserted, such provision would have aided appellant.

2

Judgment affirmed.

1

Honorable Russell E. Smith, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation

Case Details

Case Name: David Ernest Ingle v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 20, 1968
Citation: 399 F.2d 690
Docket Number: 22763
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.