History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daniel M. Morgan v. United States of America, Alfred Ziegele v. United States of America, Herbert L. Nolte v. United States
389 F.2d 713
| 9th Cir. | 1968
|
Check Treatment

389 F.2d 713

Daniel M. MORGAN, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Alfred ZIEGELE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Herbert L. NOLTE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 20715, 20733, 20734.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1968.

James F. Hewitt (argued), George L. Cooke (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

Philip Wilens, Allan Streller, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLIN, MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The three appellants were convicted under an indictment charging them with violating 26 U.S.C. 7201, by wilfully and knowingly attempting to evade and defeat the tax imposed by 26 U.S.C. 4401. The judgment of conviction cannot stand. Grosso v. United States, 1968, 390 U.S. 62, 88 S. Ct. 709, 19 L. Ed. 2d 906, and see Marchetti v. United States, 1968, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S. Ct. 697, 19 L. Ed. 2d 889.

2

Each judgment is reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Daniel M. Morgan v. United States of America, Alfred Ziegele v. United States of America, Herbert L. Nolte v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 7, 1968
Citation: 389 F.2d 713
Docket Number: 20734_1
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.