History
  • No items yet
midpage
National Labor Relations Board v. B & M Excavating, Inc.
368 F.2d 624
| 9th Cir. | 1966
|
Check Treatment

368 F.2d 624

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
B & M EXCAVATING, INC., Respondent.

No. 20936.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

November 8, 1966.

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Gregory L. Hellbung, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Patrick B. Phelan, Long Beach, Cal., for respondent.

Before HAMLEY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

The National Labor Relations Board (Board) did not err in finding and concluding that B & M Excavating, Inc., is subject to the Board's jurisdiction, and that the company had violated section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 452 (1935), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158.

2

The Board's cease and desist order of November 23, 1965, based upon such findings and conclusions, will therefore be enforced.

Case Details

Case Name: National Labor Relations Board v. B & M Excavating, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 8, 1966
Citation: 368 F.2d 624
Docket Number: 20936_1
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.