History
  • No items yet
midpage
Allen Elliott v. Edwards Engineering Corp.
364 F.2d 991
| 10th Cir. | 1966
|
Check Treatment

364 F.2d 991

Allen W. ELLIOTT, Administrator of the Estate of Lloyd E.
Elliott, deceased, Appellant,
v.
EDWARDS ENGINEERING CORP., a New Jersey corporation,
White-Rodgers Co., a Missouri corporation, and
Snodgrass & Smith Co., a partnership
doing business in Colorado, Appellees.

No. 8287.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 31, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; Alfred A. Arraj, Judge.

Jay L. Gueck, Denver, Colo., of Hindry, Erickson & Meyer, denver, colo., for appellant.

Thomas T. Crumpacker, Denver, Colo. Eugene S. Hames, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for appellees.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether at the time of the attempted service of summons on an employee of the appellee foreign corporation, it was doing business in the State of Colorado, hence amenable to the jurisdiction of the courts of that State.

2

Following applicable Colorado law, and distinguishing this case from Focht v. Southwestern Skyways, Inc., D.C., 220 F.Supp. 441, affm'd 10 Cir., 336 F.2d 603, the trial court held that the activities of the employee on which attempted service was made were quantitatively and qualitatively insufficient to meet the test of 'minimum contacts' so as to constitute doing business in the state.

3

We affirm the judgment of the trial court for the reasons stated in its opinion. 257 F.Supp. 537.

Case Details

Case Name: Allen Elliott v. Edwards Engineering Corp.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 31, 1966
Citation: 364 F.2d 991
Docket Number: 8287
Court Abbreviation: 10th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.