History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leonard Bursten v. William J. Phillips, Sidney J. Adler, Bernardo M. Yorba, Donald N. Schneider, and Stephen W. Bradford
351 F.2d 616
| 9th Cir. | 1965
|
Check Treatment

351 F.2d 616

Leonard BURSTEN, Appellant,
v.
William J. PHILLIPS, Sidney J. Adler, Bernardo M. Yorba,
Donald N. Schneider, and Stephen W. Bradford, Appellees.

No. 19410.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 6, 1965.

James O. Warner, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Daniel L. Stack, Launer, Chaffee & Hanna, Fullerton, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Appeal from an order denying a preliminary injunction. It appears that the matter is moot, and that the appeal should be dismissed. Appellant asserts that the findings that the trial court made purport to dispose of the merits of the action. That is not their effect. Ordinarily, the findings made on motion for preliminary injunction, even though they relate, in whole or in part, to issues going to the merits of the case, are not determinative of those issues at trial. (See Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc., 9 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 804.) We see no reason to depart from the ordinary rule in this case. Appellant, at trial of the merits, will be entitled to have new findings made as to all material issues. There is no need to order the findings vacated.

1

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Leonard Bursten v. William J. Phillips, Sidney J. Adler, Bernardo M. Yorba, Donald N. Schneider, and Stephen W. Bradford
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 6, 1965
Citation: 351 F.2d 616
Docket Number: 19410
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.