History
  • No items yet
midpage
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Bendix Corporation
327 F.2d 497
| 4th Cir. | 1964
|
Check Treatment

327 F.2d 497

TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Appellants,
v.
BENDIX CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 9085.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued November 4, 1963.

Decided January 17, 1964.

Walter J. Blenko, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John W. Avirett, II, Baltimore, Md., Walter J. Blenko, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., M. Victor Leventritt, New York City, Piper & Marbury, Baltimore, Md., and Blenko, Hoopes, Leonard & Buell, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief), for appellants.

Harold J. Birch and Edward S. Irons, Washington, D. C. (Benjamin C. Howard, Baltimore, Md., William W. Beckett, Hyattsville, Md., Edward F. McKie, Jr., Washington, D. C., Miles & Stockbridge, Baltimore, Md., and Irons, Birch, Swindler & McKie, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

After careful consideration of the record, the arguments and the briefs of counsel, we are persuaded that the patent claims are invalid for obviousness in the light of the prior art for the reasons fully discussed in the opinion of the District Court. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp., D.C. Md., 218 F. Supp. 1.

2

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Bendix Corporation
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 17, 1964
Citation: 327 F.2d 497
Docket Number: 9085_1
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.