History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hodgson & Thompson v. Bowerbank
1809 U.S. LEXIS 437
| SCOTUS | 1809
|
Check Treatment
9 U.S. 303 (1809)
5 Cranch 303

HODGSON AND THOMPSON
v.
BOWERBANK AND OTHERS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Martin contended.

C. Lee, contra.

*304 MARSHALL, Ch. J.

Turn to the article of the constitution of the United States, for the statute cannot extend the jurisdiction beyond the limits of the constitution.

(The words of the constitution were found to be "between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens, or subjects.")

The court said the objection was fatal.

The record was afterwards amended by consent.

Case Details

Case Name: Hodgson & Thompson v. Bowerbank
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 1, 1809
Citation: 1809 U.S. LEXIS 437
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.