History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Padro
75 N.Y.2d 820
| NY | 1990
|
Check Treatment
75 N.Y.2d 820 (1990)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Moses Padro, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 4, 1990.
Decided February 8, 1990.

Myron Beldock and Lee F. Bantle for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Patrick J. Hynes and Donald J. Siewert of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA. Taking no part: Judge ALEXANDER.

Order affirmed. A postverdict motion made pursuant to CPL 330.30 is not, by itself, ordinarily sufficient to preserve a "question of law" within the meaning of CPL 470.05 (2) and inasmuch as defendant failed to make appropriate objections during trial, the points presented by defendant are not preserved for review in this court.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Padro
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 8, 1990
Citation: 75 N.Y.2d 820
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.