History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Arroyo
77 N.Y.2d 947
| NY | 1991
|
Check Treatment
77 N.Y.2d 947 (1991)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Reynaldo Arroyo, Also Known as Reynardo Arroyo, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued March 21, 1991.
Decided April 25, 1991.

Mark Gimpel and E. Joshua Rosenkranz for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney (Patrick McCormick and Peter D. Coddington of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur.

*948MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

While defendant now urges that the trial court committed reversible error in precluding him from calling his mother as a witness to corroborate certain details of his account of the night of the robbery, his offer of proof was insufficient to alert the trial court to the relevance of the testimony. For that reason, the trial court's exclusion of the witness was not reversible error. Defendant's remaining arguments, to the extent preserved, are without merit.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Arroyo
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 25, 1991
Citation: 77 N.Y.2d 947
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.