History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lanzi v. Brooks
43 N.Y.2d 947
| NY | 1978
|
Check Treatment
43 N.Y.2d 947 (1978)

Joseph Lanzi, Appellant,
v.
Arthur Brooks, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted February 13, 1978.
Decided February 22, 1978.

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "This determination is without prejudice to an application by appellant to Supreme Court for leave to serve an amended complaint, such application to include a copy of the proposed amended complaint accompanied by a disclosure of the evidentiary facts which would support the claim set forth in the proposed amended complaint and would justify the granting of such leave (cf. CPLR 3211, subd [d])." [See 43 N.Y.2d 778.]

Case Details

Case Name: Lanzi v. Brooks
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 22, 1978
Citation: 43 N.Y.2d 947
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.