History
  • No items yet
midpage
PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express
1962 U.S. LEXIS 66
| SCOTUS | 1962
|
Check Treatment
371 U.S. 184 (1962)

PENSICK & GORDON, INC.,
v.
CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS ET AL.

No. 222.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 3, 1962.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Carl M. Gould for petitioner.

Theodore W. Russell, George L. Catlin and Joseph P. Loeb for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Hewitt-Robins Inc. v. Eastern Freight-Ways, Inc., ante, p. 84.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment below for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in Hewitt-Robins.

Case Details

Case Name: PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 3, 1962
Citation: 1962 U.S. LEXIS 66
Docket Number: 222
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 66