History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co.
289 F.2d 902
| D.C. Cir. | 1961
|
Check Treatment

289 F.2d 902

Edward M. STUART and The John E. Stuart Company, Appellants,
v.
Theodore C. MEEKER, doing business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co., Appellee.

No. 16060.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 28, 1961.

Decided May 11, 1961.

Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied June 7, 1961.

Mr. J. Robert Carey, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Michael F. Keogh and John F. Costello, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. John F. Burke, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellants.

Mr. John L. Ingoldsby, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Patrick J. Head, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, and EDGERTON and PRETTYMAN Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The parties had been partners in an air conditioning business. Stuart sold his interest to Meeker and agreed that for two years he would not "interfere" with Meeker's business, but would work for him as a part-time employee. Meeker sued Stuart for alleged violations of the dissolution agreement and was awarded damages and other relief. Stuart appeals.

2

We accept the trial court's interpretation of the dissolution agreement, and are of the opinion that the evidence supported its decision.

3

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jun 7, 1961
Citation: 289 F.2d 902
Docket Number: 16060
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.