ORDER

Rule 7.1 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.S.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, currently provides in pertinent part:

A lawyer who has been convicted in any Jurisdiction of a crime which demonstrates such lawyer's unfitness to practice law, regardless of whether the conviction resulted from a plea of guilty or nolo conten-dere or from a verdict after trial, shall be subject to discipline as herein provided, regardless of the pendency of an appeal.

To correct an oversight in the disciplinary system, Rule 7.1 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, is hereby amended to provide in pertinent part:

A lawyer who has been convicted or has tendered a plea of guilty or nolo conten-dere pursuant to a deferred sentence plea agreement in any jurisdiction of a crime which demonstrates such lawyer's unfitness to practice law, regardless of whether the conviction resulted from a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or from a verdict after trial, shall be subject to discipline as herein provided, regardless of the pendency of an appeal. (Emphasis supplied.)

Rule 7.2, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001 Ch. 1, App. 1-A currently provides:

The clerk of any court within this State in which a lawyer is convicted shall transmit certified copies of the indictment or information and judgment and sentence of conviction to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and to the General Counsel of the Oklahoma Bar Association within (5) days *567 after said conviction. The documents may also be furnished to the Chief Justice by the General Counsel. Such documents, whether from this jurisdiction or any other jurisdiction shall constitute the charge and be conclusive evidence of the commission of the crime upon which the judgment and sentence is based and shall suffice as the basis for discipline in accordance with these rules.

Rule 7.2, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001 Ch. 1, App. 1-A is hereby amended to provide:

The clerk of any court within this State in which a lawyer is convicted or as to whom proceedings are deferred shall transmit certified copies of the Judgment and Sentence on a plea of guilty, order deferring judgment and sentence, indictment or information and judgment and sentence of conviction to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and to the General Counsel of the Oklahoma Bar Association within (5) days after said conviction. The documents may also be furnished to the Chief Justice by the General Counsel. Such documents, whether from this jurisdiction or any other jurisdiction shall constitute the charge and be conclusive evidence of the commission of the crime upon which the judgment and sentence is based and shall suffice as the basis for discipline in accordance with these rules. (Emphasis supplied.)

Rule 7.3 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, currently provides in pertinent part:

Upon receipt of the certified copies of such indictment or information and the judgment and sentence, the Supreme Court shall by order immediately suspend the lawyer from the practice of law until further order of the Court. In its order of suspension the Court shall direct the lawyer to appear at a time certain, to show cause, if any he has, why the order of suspension should be set aside. Upon good cause shown, the Court may set aside its order of suspension when it appears to be in the interest of justice to do so, due regard being had to maintaining the integrity of and confidence in the profession.

Rule 7.3, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001 Ch. 1, App. 1-A is hereby amended to provide:

Upon receipt of the certified copies of Judgment and Sentence on a plea of guilty, order deferring judgment and sentence, indictment or information and the judgment and sentence, the Supreme Court shall by order immediately suspend the lawyer from the practice of law until further order of the Court. In its order of © suspension the Court shall direct the lawyer to appear at a time certain, to show cause, if any he has, why the order of suspension should be set aside. Upon good ecause shown, the Court may set aside its order of suspension when it appears to be in the interest of justice to do so, due regard being had to maintaining the integrity of and confidence in the profession. (Emphasis supplied.)

/s/ JAMES R. WINCHESTER CHIEF JUSTICE WINCHESTER, C.J., EDMONDSON, V.C.J., HARGRAVE, OPALA, KAUGER, TAYLOR JJ., concur. LAVENDER, COLBERT, JJ., concur in part, dissent in part. WATT, J, dissent.