History
  • No items yet
midpage
Parr v. State
307 S.W.2d 94
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1957
|
Check Treatment
307 S.W.2d 94 (1957)

George B. PARR, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29076.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

November 20, 1957.

Percy Foreman, Houston, Luther E. Jones, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Sam Burris, Dist. Atty., Alice, Sidney P. Chandler, and Samuel C. Ratliff, Assts. *95 Atty. Gen., Wallace T. Barber, Dist. Atty., San Marcos, H. A. Triesch, County Atty., New Braunfels, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is conspiracy to commit a felony; the punishment, five years.

The indictment under which appellant was tried and convicted is the identical indictment which this Court, by the majority opinion in Donald v. State, 306 S.W.2d 360, held to be invalid because it showed upon its face that the offense charged was barred by limitation. The writer's views on the question are set forth in that case.

The disposition of this appeal is governed by the Donald case in which mandate has issued.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Parr v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 20, 1957
Citation: 307 S.W.2d 94
Docket Number: 29076
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.