History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Selenski
937 A.2d 445
| Pa. | 2007
|
Check Treatment

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent
v.
HUGO MARCUS SELENSKI, Petitioner.

No. 412 MAL 2007

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District

November 27, 2007

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Discuss whether the Superior Court was correct in concluding that "the Commonwealth exercised due diligence and that the circumstances occasioning the postponement were beyond the control of the Commonwealth" within the meaning of Pa.R.Crim.P. 600(G).
(2) Discuss whether the Superior Court applied the proper standard of review and the proper scope of review in reviewing the trial court's order granting Petitioner's motion to dismiss under Pa.R.Crim.P. 600.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Selenski
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 27, 2007
Citation: 937 A.2d 445
Docket Number: 412 MAL 2007
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.