History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kent v. County of Hudson
53 N.J. 546
| N.J. | 1969
|
Check Treatment
53 N.J. 546 (1969)
251 A.2d 760

HAZEL KENT, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF JOHN F. CROSBY, DECEASED, AND GENERAL, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN F. CROSBY, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 18 and March 31, 1969.
Decided April 3, 1969.

Mr. Daniel F. Gilmore argued the cause for appellant (Mr. William F. Kelly, Jr., Hudson County counsel, attorney).

Mr. Lewis M. Holland argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Warren, Chasen, Leyner & Holland, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The Appellate Division reversed a judgment entered for the defendant on a jury verdict, 102 N.J. Super. 208 (1968). We granted defendant's petition for certification, 53 N.J. 23 (1968). We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the Appellate Division. The issue not having been raised, we express no view as to whether evidence of negligence exists in the present record.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Kent v. County of Hudson
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 3, 1969
Citation: 53 N.J. 546
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.