History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller Auto Leasing v. Weinstein
193 N.J. Super. 328
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1984
|
Check Treatment
193 N.J. Super. 328 (1984)
473 A.2d 996

MILLER AUTO LEASING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MARTIN S. WEINSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS LINCOLN HARDWARE & SUPPLY, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 2, 1984.
Decided April 17, 1984.

Before Judges BISCHOFF, PETRELLA and BRODY.

*329 Robert E. Bennett, argued the cause for appellant (Mark R. Silber, attorney; Robert E. Bennett on the brief).

John A. Sweeney argued the cause for respondent (Dietz, Allen & Sweeney, attorneys; John A. Sweeney on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Wells, reported at 189 N.J. Super. 543 (Law Div. 1983).

Case Details

Case Name: Miller Auto Leasing v. Weinstein
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Apr 17, 1984
Citation: 193 N.J. Super. 328
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.