History
  • No items yet
midpage
Watel v. Richman
576 S.W.2d 779
| Tex. | 1978
|
Check Treatment
576 S.W.2d 779 (1978)

Buddy WATEL, Petitioner,
v.
Victor RICHMAN and wife, Marion Richman, Respondents.

No. B-7673.

Supreme Court of Texas.

November 1, 1978.

*780 Hoppenstein & Prager, Ronald L. McKinney, Dallas, for petitioner.

Calvin A. Barker, Jr., Dallas, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is a summary judgment case. The court of civil appeals correctly reversed and remanded for new trial. 565 S.W.2d 101. There are disputed issues of fact to be tried. Our action should not be interpreted, however, as approving the holding by the court of civil appeals that an express written warranty may not limit or exclude the implied warranties described in Humber v. Morton, 426 S.W.2d 554 (Tex.1968). We express no opinion on that question.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.

Case Details

Case Name: Watel v. Richman
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 1, 1978
Citation: 576 S.W.2d 779
Docket Number: B-7673
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.