History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station
311 A.2d 178
| N.J. | 1973
|
Check Treatment
63 N.J. 593 (1973)
311 A.2d 178

BERTHA SCHRAMM AND GEORGE SCHRAMM, PLAINTIFFS'-RESPONDENTS,
v.
ARSENAL ESSO STATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KRAUSZER'S VENDING, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 5, 1973.
Decided November 20, 1973.

Mr. Herbert Klein argued the cause for appellant Krauszer's Vending, Inc. (Messrs. Krieger and Klein, attorneys; Mr. William J. Pollinger on the brief).

Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondent Arsenal Esso Station. (Philip M. Lustbader, David Lustbader, a Professional Corporation, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantally for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station and Krauszer's Vending, Inc., reported at 124 N.J. Super. 135 (App. Div. 1973).

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 6.

Opposed — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 20, 1973
Citation: 311 A.2d 178
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.