History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCarthy v. Emmons
135 Vt. 450
| Vt. | 1977
|
Check Treatment
378 A.2d 107 (1977)

Gary L. McCARTHY and Dawn McCarthy
v.
Bernard C. EMMONS and Theresa A. Emmons.

No. 340-76.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

September 21, 1977.

M. Martin Leinwohl, Barre, for plaintiffs.

Abare, Donaghy & Nicholls, P.C., Barre, for defendants.

Before BARNEY, C. J., and DALEY, LARROW, BILLINGS and HILL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in this case appeal from a judgment in their favor on the ground of inadequacy. No motion for new trial under V.R. C.P. 59, or to amend findings or judgment under V.R.C.P. 52(b), was filed in the trial court.

As we held in Fournier v. Estate of Loiselle, 132 Vt. 601, 602, 326 A.2d 155 (1974), the issue of adequacy of damages is one which must be preserved for the trial court's consideration. Absent such presentation and ruling thereon, no ruling adverse to the plaintiff appears.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: McCarthy v. Emmons
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Sep 21, 1977
Citation: 135 Vt. 450
Docket Number: 340-76
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.