History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Foye
63 N.J. 534
| N.J. | 1973
|
Check Treatment
63 N.J. 534 (1973)
309 A.2d 897

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JAMES ELLIS FOYE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 26, 1973.
Decided October 9, 1973.

Miss Rita L. Bender, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Eugene H. Farber, Assistant Prosecutor argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Edwin H. Stern, Acting Prosecutor of Hudson County, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. State of New Jersey v. Foye, 125 N.J. Super. 184 (App. Div. 1973).

For affirmance — Chief Justice GARVEN and Justices JACOBS, HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Foye
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 9, 1973
Citation: 63 N.J. 534
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.