History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vesley v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance
93 N.J. 323
| N.J. | 1983
|
Check Treatment
93 N.J. 323 (1983)
460 A.2d 1057

DENNIS D. VESLEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, A MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND SAMUEL A. GENNET, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 9, 1983.
Decided June 6, 1983.

Brian D. Vesley argued the cause for appellant.

Samuel A. Gennet argued the cause for respondent (Gennet & Kallmann, attorneys; Mark L. Antin, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The members of the Court being equally divided, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed. 189 N.J. Super. 521.

No costs to either party.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD and O'HERN — 3.

For reversal — Justice HANDLER — 1.

For reversal and remandment — Justices POLLOCK and GARIBALDI — 2.

Case Details

Case Name: Vesley v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 6, 1983
Citation: 93 N.J. 323
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.