History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wissinoming Bottling Co. v. School District of Philadelphia
543 Pa. 402
| Pa. | 1996
|
Check Treatment
543 Pa. 402 (1996)
672 A.2d 279

WISSINOMING BOTTLING COMPANY
v.
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA and City of Philadelphia and Honorable Cheryl Weiss, Appellants at No. 49.
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellant at No. 50
v.
TAX REVIEW BOARD OF CITY OF PHILADELPHIA to the Use of Clement & Muller, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 22, 1996.
Decided February 13, 1996.

Joseph A. Dworetzky, Philadelphia and Richard Feder, for School District of Phila.

Stewart M. Weintraub and Ellen M. Gussman, Philadelphia, for Clement, et al.

*403 BEFORE: NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE and NIGRO, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

FLAHERTY, CASTILLE and NIGRO, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Commonwealth Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Wissinoming Bottling Co. v. School District of Philadelphia
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 13, 1996
Citation: 543 Pa. 402
Docket Number: Appeals 49 and 50 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1995
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.