Werbel v. Mullen
11 N.J. 40
| N.J. | 1952|
Check TreatmentELEANOR S. WERBEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BELLE MULLEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*43 Mr. Paul C. Kemeny argued the cause for the appellant.
Mr. Milton Lowenstein argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Sidney K. Werbel, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam filed in the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN 7.
For reversal None.
