History
  • No items yet
midpage
Merlini Ex Rel. Merlini v. Gallitzin Water Authority
950 A.2d 264
| Pa. | 2008
|
Check Treatment
950 A.2d 264 (2008)

Mary Rose MERLINI, by and Through her Attorney-in-Fact Joseph P. Merlini
v.
GALLITZIN WATER AUTHORITY, Hegemann and Wray Consulting Engineers, Kukurin Contracting, Inc.
Petition of Hegemann and Wray Consulting Engineers.

No. 543 WAL 2007

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 20, 2008.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2008 the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court's published decision below is inconsistent with its decision in Varner v. Classic Communities Corporation, [890 A.2d 1068 (Pa.Super.2006)] relative to professional negligence claims?
a) Whether a cause of action is one of professional negligence if it depends upon expert testimony for elucidation?
b) Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that, although expert testimony is required as to [Petitioner]'s negligence, [Respondent]'s cause of action was not one of professional negligence?

(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in failing to apply the plain language of the Engineer, Land Surveyor and Geologist *265 registration law in holding that the subject of complaint did not assert a professional negligence claim?

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Case Details

Case Name: Merlini Ex Rel. Merlini v. Gallitzin Water Authority
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 20, 2008
Citation: 950 A.2d 264
Docket Number: 543 WAL 2007
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.