Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons
88 A.2d 201
| N.J. | 1952|
Check TreatmentNEIL STRUYK, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SAMUEL BRAEN'S SONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Evans, Hand and Evans, of counsel).
Mr. Paul Rittenberg argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Peter Hofstra, attorney; Mr. Howard Stern, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and JACOBS 5.
For reversal None.