History
  • No items yet
midpage
Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
247 A.2d 667
| N.J. | 1968
|
Check Treatment
53 N.J. 7 (1968)
247 A.2d 667

SALVATORE PIRO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 6, 1968.
Decided November 25, 1968.

Mr. Geoffrey Gaulkin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Beggans and Keale, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur N. D'Italia argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Warren, Chasan, Leyner & Holland, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N.J. Super. 456.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 25, 1968
Citation: 247 A.2d 667
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.