History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nebel v. Nebel
103 N.J. Super. 216
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1968
|
Check Treatment
103 N.J. Super. 216 (1968)
247 A.2d 27

JEANNE D. NEBEL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT,
v.
ARTHUR J. NEBEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 14, 1968.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

Mr. Colin M. Dillon argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pollis, Williams, Pappas & Dillon, attorneys).

Mr. Harold G. Pierson argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Chancery Division order under appeal is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Wood, 99 N.J. Super. 256. The record provides substantial support for his findings and conclusions.

Case Details

Case Name: Nebel v. Nebel
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Oct 14, 1968
Citation: 103 N.J. Super. 216
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.