Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.
32 N.J. 277
| N.J. | 1960|
Check TreatmentFLUORO ELECTRIC CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SMITH TRANSPORT LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, attorneys).
Mr. Arthur Slavitt argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.
BURLING, J., concurring in result.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO 7.
For reversal None.