History
  • No items yet
midpage
King v. Nixon
207 F.2d 41
| D.C. Cir. | 1953
|
Check Treatment

207 F.2d 41

KING
v.
NIXON.

No. 11569.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 13, 1953.

Decided August 27, 1953.

Mr. Saul G. Lichtenberg, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Ira M. Lowe and Mr. Evan T. Davis, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. William E. Owen, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The District Court rightly ruled that recovery of exemplary or punitive damages, in a civil action for assault and battery, is not precluded by the fact that the defendant may be liable to criminal prosecution,1 and also that the defendant's financial condition is admissible in evidence as bearing on the amount of such damages. Brown v. Evans, C.C., 17 F. 912; affirmed, Evans v. Brown, 1883, 109 U.S. 180, 3 S.Ct. 83, 27 L.Ed. 898; notes, 16 A.L.R. 771, 798, 838, 123 A.L.R. 1115, 1122, 1136.

2

Affirmed.

Notes:

1

Language to the contrary in Huber v. Teuber, 1879, 3 MacArthur 484, 497, 10 D.C. 484, is erroneous

Case Details

Case Name: King v. Nixon
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Aug 27, 1953
Citation: 207 F.2d 41
Docket Number: 11569_1
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.