History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shell Oil Co. v. Zoning Bd. Adj. Shrewsbury
316 A.2d 5
| N.J. | 1974
|
Check Treatment
64 N.J. 334 (1974)
316 A.2d 5

SHELL OIL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF SHREWSBURY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 5, 1974.
Decided February 20, 1974.

*336 Mr. Robert H. Otten argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Crowell & Otten, attorneys; Mr. David W. Clark on the brief.)

Mr. Lawrence A. Carton, III argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Pillsbury, Barnacle, Russell & Carton, attorneys; Mr. John G. Colannino on the brief.)

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky, reported at 127 N.J. Super. 60, 62 (1974).

For reversal — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justice JACOBS, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 7.

For affirmance — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Shell Oil Co. v. Zoning Bd. Adj. Shrewsbury
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 20, 1974
Citation: 316 A.2d 5
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.