History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kaplan v. Haines
241 A.2d 235
| N.J. | 1968
|
Check Treatment
51 N.J. 404 (1968)
241 A.2d 235

JOHANNA KAPLAN AND SIDNEY KAPLAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
KEITH HAINES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 18, 1968.
Decided April 1, 1968.

Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, attorneys; Mr. Abraham I. Harkavy of counsel).

Mr. William G. Bischoff argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Taylor, Bischoff, Neutze & Williams, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the majority opinion of Judge Lewis in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Kaplan v. Haines
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 1, 1968
Citation: 241 A.2d 235
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.