History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bruni v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
241 A.2d 449
| N.J. | 1968
|
Check Treatment
51 N.J. 408 (1968)
241 A.2d 449

ANNA A. BRUNI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 22, 1968.
Decided April 1, 1968.

*409 Mr. Frank Thatcher argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph R. Moss, attorney).

Mr. Samuel Kalikman argued the cause for respondent (Mr. George D. Rothermel, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Carton in the Appellate Division, 100 N.J. Super. 154.

*410 For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For affirmance — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Bruni v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 1, 1968
Citation: 241 A.2d 449
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.