History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Kirk
211 A.2d 200
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1965
|
Check Treatment
88 N.J. Super. 130 (1965)
211 A.2d 200

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
GEROLD KIRK, FRANK SCHOOLEY, CHARLES WADAS AND RAYMOND VICKNAIR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 24, 1965.
Decided May 28, 1965.

Before Judges KILKENNY, SULLIVAN and LEWIS.

Mr. Doane Regan argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Rothbard, Harris & Oxfeld, attorneys).

Mr. Philip R. Glucksman argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Brendan T. Byrne, County Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney; Mr. John J. Francis, Jr., Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Glickenhaus, then of the Essex County Court, as set forth in his opinion reported in 84 N.J. Super. 151 (Cty. Ct. 1964).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Kirk
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: May 28, 1965
Citation: 211 A.2d 200
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.