History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mestice v. McShea
201 F.2d 363
| 3rd Cir. | 1953
|
Check Treatment

201 F.2d 363

MESTICE
v.
McSHEA et al.

No. 10959.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued January 19, 1953.

Decided January 23, 1953.

William R. Mestice, pro se.

Robert Scherling, Newark, N. J., for appellees.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Appellant seeks review of an order dismissing with prejudice his petition for relief from a state court judgment. He asks removal of the proceedings to a federal court and an injunction against the judgment. It is unnecessary to go into the history or merits of the litigation. Suffice it to say that there are no proceedings to remove here. The state litigation terminated in a judgment which is now final. It is, therefore, res judicata. This court has no authority to sit in review of that judgment.

2

The order dismissing the petition will be affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Mestice v. McShea
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: Jan 23, 1953
Citation: 201 F.2d 363
Docket Number: 10959_1
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.